🔗 Share this article

Official papers show that ministers implemented a proscription on Palestine Action even after obtaining warnings that such action could “accidentally amplify” the organization’s profile, as shown in leaked official records.

Background

This advisory report was drafted three months before the official proscription of the network, which was established to conduct protests designed to stop UK arms supplies to Israel.

The document was written three months ago by officials at the department of home affairs and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, aided by national security policing experts.

Survey Findings

Beneath the headline “How would the outlawing of the group be regarded by the UK public”, a part of the briefing alerted that a proscription could become a divisive matter.

It described the network as a “modest single issue organization with lower traditional press attention” compared to comparable protest movements like Just Stop Oil. But it noted that the network’s activities, and arrests of its activists, received media attention.

The advisers noted that polling indicated “rising dissatisfaction with IDF methods and actions in Gaza”.

In the lead-up to its key argument, the report cited a study indicating that 60% of British citizens felt Israel had gone too far in the hostilities in Gaza and that a similar number backed a prohibition on arms shipments.

“These are viewpoints upon which the organization forms its identity, organising explicitly to challenge the Israeli arms industry in the UK,” it said.

“In the event that Palestine Action is outlawed, their visibility may inadvertently be enhanced, finding support among sympathetic members of the public who disagree with the UK involvement in the Israeli arms industry.”

Additional Warnings

Officials noted that the general populace opposed appeals from the certain outlets for tough action, like a proscription.

Additional parts of the document mentioned polling saying the public had a “general lack of awareness” regarding Palestine Action.

It stated that “a significant segment of the UK population are probably presently uninformed of Palestine Action and would stay that way should there be proscription or, if informed, would remain largely untroubled”.

The ban under terrorism laws has resulted in demonstrations where thousands have been apprehended for displaying signs in the streets declaring “I reject atrocities, I back the group”.

This briefing, which was a social effects evaluation, said that a outlawing under security legislation could escalate Muslim-Jewish frictions and be viewed as official bias in support of Israel.

The briefing warned ministers and top advisers that proscription could become “a flashpoint for substantial debate and objections”.

Recent Events

One leader of the group, commented that the report’s advisories had proven accurate: “Awareness of the concerns and popularity of the network have increased dramatically. The outlawing has had the opposite effect.”

The senior official at the point, Yvette Cooper, declared the outlawing in June, immediately after the network’s supporters supposedly caused damage at a military base in Oxfordshire. Officials asserted the harm was extensive.

The timing of the briefing shows the ban was being planned long prior to it was announced.

Policymakers were informed that a proscription might be regarded as an assault on personal freedoms, with the advisers noting that certain people in government as well as the wider public may see the decision as “a creep of security authorities into the area of free expression and demonstration.”

Government Statements

An interior ministry official stated: “The network has engaged in an increasingly aggressive series entailing criminal damage to Britain’s critical defense sites, coercion, and claimed attacks. These actions places the wellbeing of the citizens at danger.

“Decisions on outlawing are carefully considered. These are based on a robust fact-driven system, with input from a diverse set of advisers from across government, the police and the MI5.”

A counter-terrorism law enforcement representative stated: “Judgments concerning proscription are a matter for the administration.

“In line with public expectations, anti-terror units, in conjunction with a selection of other agencies, routinely supply information to the department to assist their operations.”

This briefing also revealed that the central government had been funding periodic studies of public strain connected to Israel and Palestine.