🔗 Share this article

When Vladimir Putin traveled to the South Asian nation four years ago, the international order looked entirely distinct. That short trip, limited by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Furthermore, that era preceded a significant shift in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory statements and the introduction of substantial import duties.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of this diplomatic mission to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Pivotal Moment for Two Major Powers

The high-level meeting occurs at a delicate moment. The Kremlin leader arrives after rejecting latest peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to claimed advances by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the primary importance of this engagement is its very occurrence," stated a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It indicates a movement toward something resembling normal international relations."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are even higher. The country faces a difficult international environment, characterized by a less engaged United States, a diminished Russia, and an assertive China.

This delicate balance was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a firm response from Indian officials, who called it an inappropriate interference.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow long being Delhi's top defense supplier. This relationship was largely tolerated by the West until a change in approach.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. Yet, recently failed peace efforts, accusations increased, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in US-India ties.

"In response, India has returned to its traditional posture of maintaining multiple options," explained a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's fundamental concern with Russia is its strategic location. "China continues to be the greatest threat to India, and historically, India has relied on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The strengthening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an excessively close bond between its adversary and its traditional ally.

This concern has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its military imports, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in recent years.

"Delhi will try to strike a balance: buy sufficient Russian weaponry to keep the partnership alive, but avoid so dependent that a sudden cutoff would cripple its defenses," the analyst concluded.

The Oil Question

Enhanced economic cooperation is likely to be a key agenda item. President Putin has recently stressed plans to take cooperation with India to a "higher plane", defying Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil imports remains central. Although the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has agreed to increase imports of American oil and gas.

A Russian official acknowledged "obstacles" in economic cooperation but said it would proceed without major disruption. The official minimized the impact of sanctions, stating they would cause only "minor" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned primarily through India's consistent appeal for dialogue and peace.

"While the Indian leader has access to all parties, India does not possess the necessary leverage to significantly influence the war," the analyst said. "Aside from encouraging talks, its ability to make a difference is limited."

In the end, notwithstanding the visible friendship between the two leaders, the relationship is fundamentally one of "pragmatic strategic interest," guided by cold calculation in a rapidly changing world.