🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.